|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
It’s easy to spot what’s wrong. Every workplace has someone who can list every flaw in a plan, every gap in a system, every reason something won’t work. Spotting the problem takes very little effort. Fixing it is a different job entirely, and it’s the job that actually moves things forward.
Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, the Nigerian economist who has served as the country’s finance minister and now leads the World Trade Organization, has built a career on this exact distinction. Naming a problem without offering a way through it isn’t leadership, it’s commentary. Her quote is a quiet challenge to pair the two, every time.
Naming a Problem and Solving It Are Two Different Skills
Here’s the part worth sitting with. Identifying issues feels productive because it requires real insight, and it often does. But insight without a proposed way forward tends to stop at the door of the next meeting, leaving the actual work for someone else to figure out.
Picture two people in the same organisation who both notice the same broken process. One raises it clearly, explains exactly what’s going wrong, and stops there. The other raises it just as clearly, and follows it immediately with two or three possible ways to fix it, even if those ideas aren’t perfect. The first person has done something useful. The second person has done something rarer, and it’s usually the second person whose voice carries more weight in the room over time, because they’ve shown they can move a conversation from complaint to action.
Instead of stopping at “here’s the problem,” it helps to build the habit of following it immediately with “and here’s what I’d try.” Even an imperfect proposed solution changes the shape of the conversation. It shifts the room from diagnosing to deciding, and decisions are where actual progress happens.
One reason people avoid offering solutions is the pressure to have the perfect, fully worked-out answer before speaking up. That pressure is misplaced. A rough first idea, offered honestly as a starting point rather than a finished plan, does more for a conversation than silence does. Okonjo-Iweala’s own record, across national and global institutions, has involved proposing imperfect but workable paths forward under real constraints, not waiting for ideal conditions that rarely arrive.
Not every proposed fix succeeds. Some solutions get tried and fall short, or need to be revised halfway through. That isn’t evidence the effort was wrong, it’s simply what solving real problems usually looks like in practice. The alternative, staying only in the business of pointing out what’s broken, guarantees nothing improves at all.
This isn’t a mindset to switch on only for big, visible crises. The habit of following a problem with a proposed solution works best when it’s applied consistently, to small frustrations as much as major setbacks. People known for this kind of thinking usually didn’t start with the big moments, they built the habit on the small ones first.
How to Put This Into Practice
You don’t need a leadership title to live by this idea, you just need to build a small habit of pairing observations with proposals.
At work: the next time you spot a problem in a meeting, can you follow it with at least one possible way to address it, even a rough one?
In business: when a process, a market or a client relationship isn’t working, are you documenting the issue alone, or also sketching out two or three ways it could be improved?
In personal life: when something in your routine or your relationships isn’t working, are you naming what’s wrong, or also trying something different to address it? Naming the problem clearly is useful. Naming it and offering a next step is what actually moves a situation forward.
Conclusion
Okonjo-Iweala’s quote challenges a common but limited habit: treating the identification of a problem as if the work were finished there. In reality, spotting what’s broken is only the first half of anything that matters.
Pairing problems with solutions doesn’t mean always having the right answer. It means always being willing to offer one, which is likely why an economist who has worked through some of the hardest institutional challenges of her career kept coming back to this same simple discipline.
