|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Indian Officials Debunk Viral Claims That Multiple World Leaders Fell Ill After BRICS Summit
A wave of viral social media posts claiming that several world leaders fell sick after attending the BRICS Summit in New Delhi has been officially labeled misleading by India’s Ministry of External Affairs, though one piece of the story checks out: South African President Cyril Ramaphosa genuinely has stepped back from public duties on medical advice.
The confusion traces back to the 18th BRICS Summit, which India hosted in New Delhi from September 12 to 13 under the banner “Building for Resilience, Innovation, Cooperation and Sustainability.” Leaders from the group’s expanded 11-member bloc gathered for two days of closed-door sessions, an outreach program with partner nations, and a series of bilateral meetings, eventually signing off on what’s being called the New Delhi Declaration, a lengthy joint statement covering everything from global governance reform to trade policy and climate cooperation.
Within days of the summit wrapping up, posts began circulating on X claiming that multiple heads of state, Ramaphosa among them, had fallen ill after the gathering, with some accounts explicitly citing the BBC as a source and others going further, suggesting Chinese President Xi Jinping had suffered a medical emergency and cut his trip short. One account calling itself Raw Egg Nationalist posted a video claiming to show footage of the summit’s catering, framing it as the culprit behind the reported illnesses. Prediction market platform Polymarket even posted a bare “JUST IN” alert repeating the claim to its followers, giving the story an extra push into mainstream visibility.
India’s Ministry of External Affairs moved quickly to shut the broader narrative down. Its fact-checking arm, MEA Fact Check, posted a direct rebuttal on X labeling the posts “misleading” and warning the public against what it called malicious content circulating on social media. The ministry specifically called out several of the viral accounts by name, including posts from users going by First Squawk, unusual_whales, Dakkadakka and BRICS News, all of which had claimed or implied that multiple leaders were sickened by the summit. One particularly aggressive post, from an account called Maverick, had gone as far as suggesting a crude alternate meaning for the BRICS acronym itself, the kind of joke that tends to spread faster than any correction can catch up to it.
Where things get more nuanced is Ramaphosa’s case specifically, because unlike the broader viral claim, his situation turned out to be genuinely confirmed rather than fabricated. South Africa’s Presidency issued its own statement on September 16 saying the 73-year-old president had been booked off from public engagements due to ill health following his return from the summit. The statement said Ramaphosa was resting on his doctors’ advice and had asked relevant ministers to represent him at scheduled events in his place. His office didn’t specify what illness he was dealing with, and there’s no indication from South African officials that his condition was linked to anything that happened at the summit itself, but the underlying fact that he was unwell and stepping back from duties was real, not invented. Compounding the timing, South Africa’s Deputy President Paul Mashatile was separately reported to be recovering from a minor medical procedure around the same period, meaning the country’s two top officials both happened to be away from public engagements simultaneously, a coincidence that likely helped the viral rumor gain traction faster than it otherwise might have.
The claims involving Xi Jinping sit on much shakier ground. A social media user identified as Wanjun Xie, described as chairman of the China Democracy Party, an overseas dissident group rather than an official Chinese body, posted claims suggesting Xi had suffered a transient ischemic attack, a type of temporary stroke, and fainted during the summit, allegedly prompting him to cut his visit short and return to Beijing early. No official Chinese government source, state media outlet, or independent confirmation has backed up that claim, and India’s Ministry of External Affairs explicitly flagged reports about Xi’s health as unverified in its fact-check response.
The episode is a fairly clean example of how a real, confirmed event, one leader genuinely falling ill after a major diplomatic gathering, can get pulled into a much larger, unsubstantiated narrative once it starts spreading across social media without context. A single accurate data point about Ramaphosa’s health got stitched together with an unverified rumor about Xi Jinping and repackaged by multiple accounts into a single, more dramatic claim implying some kind of mass illness event tied directly to the summit itself, phrasing that several outlets picked up and amplified before official channels had a chance to weigh in.
As of Thursday, the confirmed picture remains narrow: one world leader, Ramaphosa, is resting on medical advice after attending the summit, with South Africa’s own government confirming that much directly. Everything beyond that, including any suggestion of a broader pattern of illness among summit attendees or specific claims about Xi Jinping’s health, remains unverified and has been formally disputed by Indian authorities.
