|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has dismissed reports circulating on social media claiming that its chairman, Professor Joash Amupitan, is preparing to resign, describing the information as false, fabricated and misleading.
The electoral commission issued the clarification on Saturday, November 14, 2026, following the circulation of an image suggesting that Amupitan was planning to step down from his position ahead of the 2027 general elections.
In a statement published on its official X account, INEC urged Nigerians to disregard the report and avoid spreading information that had not been verified through the commission’s recognised communication channels.
The clarification comes amid growing public scrutiny of Amupitan’s leadership following controversies surrounding the preliminary voters’ register, allegations of registration irregularities and protests by Nigerians in London demanding his resignation.
The controversy has placed the electoral commission under renewed pressure to demonstrate its independence, transparency and preparedness for the next general elections.
INEC, however, has maintained that the resignation report is entirely fabricated and has advised the public to rely on verified announcements rather than social media claims.
The development has attracted attention because Nigeria is approaching another major election cycle, with political parties, electoral stakeholders and citizens increasingly examining the commission’s decisions and preparations.
INEC Describes Amupitan Resignation Report as Fake News
In its response to the circulating claim, INEC made it clear that there was no truth to the suggestion that its chairman was preparing to leave office.
The commission described the report as false, fabricated and misleading, warning Nigerians against sharing the image or treating it as an authentic announcement.
INEC’s statement was direct:
“The claim is FALSE, FABRICATED AND MISLEADING.”
The commission also encouraged members of the public to obtain information about its activities through official communication platforms.
The clarification was necessary because social media has increasingly become a channel through which unverified political information spreads, particularly during periods of heightened electoral activity.
Reports concerning the resignation of the head of an electoral commission can create uncertainty among political parties, election observers and voters.
Such claims can also affect public confidence in an institution that is expected to operate independently of political interests.
By publicly rejecting the report, INEC sought to prevent the rumour from developing into a wider controversy.
However, the commission’s denial does not automatically resolve the broader concerns surrounding Amupitan’s leadership. Questions about the preliminary voters’ register, electoral transparency and the institution’s credibility remain important issues ahead of the 2027 elections.
Why Nigerians Are Demanding Amupitan’s Resignation
The resignation rumour emerged against the background of growing criticism of INEC following concerns about irregularities in the preliminary voters’ register.
Amupitan has faced questions about the commission’s handling of voter registration records, particularly after questionable entries and photographs circulated online.
Some of the allegations involved suspected duplicate registrations, photographs believed to have been generated using artificial intelligence and questionable polling unit records.
The controversy became more prominent after the commission acknowledged that irregularities had occurred during the registration process.
On November 9, 2026, Amupitan disclosed that INEC had removed 1,608,660 invalid registrations from the preliminary voters’ register following a review of records generated through the 2025 and 2026 Continuous Voter Registration exercises.
He also disclosed that 54 individuals across 10 states had been identified as allegedly involved in registration irregularities.
According to the chairman, those implicated could face disciplinary measures, including possible prosecution, depending on the findings of the investigations.
The commission’s action was presented as part of efforts to clean up the national voters’ register before the 2027 general elections.
However, the announcement also generated further questions about how questionable records entered the system and what measures INEC was taking to prevent similar incidents in the future.
For many Nigerians, the credibility of the voters’ register is fundamental to the integrity of an election.
An inaccurate register could create opportunities for multiple voting, impersonation and other electoral offences if the problems are not properly addressed.
The commission must therefore demonstrate that its review process is comprehensive and that individuals responsible for deliberate violations are held accountable.
London Protesters Demand Amupitan’s Resignation
Pressure on the INEC chairman intensified during his visit to the United Kingdom, where protesters confronted his convoy outside Chatham House in London on Thursday, November 12, 2026.
The demonstrators, reportedly Nigerians living in the United Kingdom, gathered as Amupitan was leaving the venue following a discussion on Nigeria’s preparations for the 2027 general elections.
Some protesters surrounded the vehicle conveying the chairman and demanded that he resign from office.
They raised concerns about the commission’s handling of the preliminary voters’ register and questioned its ability to conduct credible elections under his leadership.
The demonstration reflected growing dissatisfaction among some Nigerians over the allegations surrounding voter registration and the electoral body’s perceived neutrality.
The protesters also raised concerns about the commission’s independence and demanded greater accountability from its leadership.
The incident attracted attention because it occurred outside Nigeria, during an international engagement intended to explain the country’s preparations for the next general elections.
It also highlighted the extent to which concerns about electoral credibility have become part of discussions among Nigerians in the diaspora.
However, the allegations raised by protesters should be distinguished from established findings. Public demonstrations and accusations do not independently establish that the electoral commission has deliberately manipulated the voters’ register.
INEC has acknowledged irregularities and announced corrective measures, but the extent of individual responsibility must be determined through proper investigations.
Amupitan Defends His Leadership at Chatham House
Despite the protest and growing criticism, Amupitan used his engagement at Chatham House to defend his leadership and explain the commission’s preparations for the 2027 elections.
The chairman maintained that his loyalty was to the Nigerian Constitution and the Electoral Act rather than any political party or individual.
Responding to questions about his neutrality, he rejected suggestions that his previous professional activities as a lawyer could compromise his responsibilities as head of the electoral commission.
He also addressed controversy surrounding an X account allegedly linked to him that reportedly published partisan content supporting the All Progressives Congress during the 2023 general elections.
INEC had previously denied that Amupitan operated the account, describing the allegations as digital impersonation.
At Chatham House, the chairman said an independent forensic review had been obtained and the matter referred to the Department of State Services and the Inspector-General of Police for investigation.
He also acknowledged that the controversies surrounding the 2023 general elections had significantly damaged public confidence in INEC.
According to him, the commission had learnt from previous shortcomings and introduced measures to improve the management of elections.
Amupitan cited recent off-cycle elections as examples of improvements under his leadership, particularly the Anambra and Osun governorship elections, where results were declared the day after voting.
He also identified insecurity, logistics and election result management as important challenges the commission must address before the 2027 polls.
The chairman urged Nigerians to give INEC the opportunity to demonstrate its commitment to credible elections, while acknowledging that public trust must be earned through transparent performance.
His remarks were particularly significant because confidence in the electoral umpire remains one of the most important factors influencing public participation in Nigerian elections. Punch Newspapers+2
INEC Announces Measures to Improve the 2027 Elections
As part of its preparations for the 2027 general elections, INEC has announced plans to test improvements to its election technology and accreditation procedures.
Amupitan disclosed that the commission would conduct a nationwide mock accreditation and voting exercise on November 28, 2026.
The exercise is expected to test upgrades to the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) and the electronic transmission of election results.
BVAS is an important component of Nigeria’s electoral process because it is used to verify voters’ identities and authenticate their eligibility before they cast their ballots.
The technology is also intended to reduce electoral fraud associated with impersonation and multiple voting.
The commission is equally working to strengthen its result management systems, particularly the Independent National Electoral Commission Election Results Viewing Portal (IReV).
The IReV portal allows members of the public to view polling unit results uploaded by electoral officials.
However, technical problems experienced during the 2023 general elections generated widespread criticism and contributed to the loss of public confidence in the commission.
Amupitan acknowledged these concerns and said INEC had introduced additional technical safeguards to prevent inaccurate polling unit results and figures indicating over-voting from being uploaded to the portal.
The November 28 exercise will therefore provide an opportunity to assess whether the upgraded systems can operate effectively before the next general elections.
For Nigerians, the successful implementation of these improvements will be important in determining whether INEC can address some of the technological challenges associated with previous elections.
When Will Nigeria’s 2027 General Elections Hold?
INEC has already announced the proposed dates for the 2027 general elections.
According to the commission’s timetable, presidential and National Assembly elections will take place on January 16, 2027.
Governorship and State Houses of Assembly elections are scheduled for February 6, 2027.
The elections will determine the country’s political leadership at federal and state levels for another electoral cycle.
The commission is expected to complete several important preparations before voting begins, including voter registration activities, publication and certification of the national voters’ register, political party nominations and distribution of election materials.
The accuracy of the voters’ register remains particularly important because it determines who is eligible to participate in the elections.
INEC has indicated that the final register, following the ongoing review and verification processes, will be certified on December 15, 2026.
The commission’s ability to address concerns about questionable entries before that deadline will be closely watched by political parties, civil society organisations and election observers.
Can the INEC Chairman Be Removed From Office?
The controversy surrounding Amupitan has also brought attention to the constitutional provisions governing the appointment and removal of the INEC chairman.
The chairman of the electoral commission does not occupy the position at the discretion of a political party or through a voluntary arrangement with the government.
The appointment and removal of the chairman are governed by the Nigerian Constitution.
Under Section 157 of the 1999 Constitution, the President may remove the INEC chairman from office, subject to a two-thirds majority resolution of the Senate supporting the removal.
This constitutional arrangement is intended to protect the independence of the electoral commission and prevent arbitrary removal based solely on political disagreements.
Consequently, demands from protesters or political organisations do not automatically result in the chairman losing his position.
Any attempt to remove an incumbent chairman must follow the constitutional procedure.
INEC’s latest statement therefore addresses the immediate resignation rumour, but it does not prevent Nigerians and political stakeholders from questioning the commission’s performance or demanding accountability.
The chairman’s responsibility is to ensure that the electoral body operates within the law and maintains the confidence of the Nigerian public.
What Happens Next After INEC’s Denial?
The immediate position is that INEC has rejected the claim that Amupitan intends to resign.
There is no confirmed announcement from the commission indicating that the chairman is preparing to leave office.
Attention is therefore expected to remain on the commission’s preparations for the 2027 general elections, particularly the review of the voters’ register and the planned nationwide mock accreditation exercise.
The commission will also need to demonstrate that its investigations into registration irregularities are thorough and that appropriate disciplinary measures are taken where wrongdoing is established.
For Amupitan, the challenge goes beyond dismissing social media reports. He must convince Nigerians that INEC can conduct elections that are transparent, inclusive and credible.
The controversy surrounding the preliminary voters’ register has made public confidence an important issue for his administration.
Political parties and civil society groups will continue monitoring the commission’s activities, while voters will expect accurate registration records and reliable election technology.
INEC’s November 14 clarification has settled one immediate question: the report claiming that Amupitan is preparing to resign is false, according to the commission.
However, the larger debate about electoral credibility, institutional independence and preparations for the 2027 elections is far from over.
