|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
PETAN Says Nigeria Needs About $6 Billion in Equipment to Reach 3 Million Barrels a Day, and Warns Skilled Workers Are Leaving
Nigeria wants to produce 3 million barrels of oil a day by 2030, up from about 1.7 million today. The trade body that speaks for local oilfield service companies says the rigs and hardware needed to get there will cost about $6 billion, and that money is not the only thing running short.
The Petroleum Technology Association of Nigeria, known as PETAN, gave the estimate at a media roundtable on the state of the oil and gas industry. Its chairman, Wole Ogunsanya, said about $6 billion would be needed for drilling equipment and related infrastructure, and he identified inadequate funding, weak infrastructure and gaps in skills as the main obstacles. Reaching 3 million barrels would mean adding roughly 1.3 million barrels a day to September’s average of 1.717 million, a jump of about three quarters.
The size of each purchase explains the problem for homegrown firms. Ogunsanya said a land rig can cost $30 million to $40 million, a swamp rig $160 million to $170 million, and a jack-up rig $300 million to $400 million, depending on specifications. Many indigenous service companies do not have balance sheets that can carry such assets without long-term contracts to guarantee repayment, which is why banks have been cautious.
PETAN’s proposed answer is a new vendor financing scheme valued at $4.1 billion plus ₦435 billion. According to Ogunsanya, it involves Renaissance Africa Energy and 13 commercial and multilateral financial institutions, and it is meant to help local contractors acquire rigs and specialised equipment. He explained that the model lets service companies obtain the equipment needed to execute contracts while giving banks greater assurance that repayments will come from the revenue the work generates. He also credited the Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board for its one percent funding mechanism, which supports equipment acquisition by local companies. The reports reviewed do not give the scheme’s terms, timeline or how many companies have drawn on it, so how much it will relieve the shortage is still unknown.
The second warning is about people. Ogunsanya said Nigeria’s most experienced oil and gas professionals are being recruited by Qatar, Saudi Arabia and others, a drain he called a huge gap that needs to be filled. He tied part of the shortage to the exit of international oil companies from onshore assets, since the multinationals had long trained many of the country’s leading engineers and technicians, and said the large university network gives Nigeria a base to rebuild that pipeline. Equipment without crews to operate it does little for output, so the labour question matters as much as the capital question.
The $6 billion figure fits into an estimate PETAN has repeated all year. At the Offshore Technology Conference in Houston in May, Ogunsanya put the cumulative need at about $6.5 billion, based on spending around $1.3 billion a year on oilfield equipment through 2030. His position has nuances, though. In July he said Nigeria already has adequate equipment and in-country capacity to reach up to 3 million barrels, and that the real challenge is utilising it with enough projects and dedicated funding. Taken together, the argument is that equipment exists but is underused, while new purchases and replacement of obsolete units are needed to scale beyond today’s level.
PETAN also tied production to demand at home. Ogunsanya said Nigeria’s refining capacity could reach about 3 million barrels a day if existing and planned projects deliver, citing Dangote’s 650,000-barrel plant and its expansion plans, about 450,000 barrels from NNPC’s refineries and a proposed 350,000-barrel refinery from BUA Group. That framing shows why industry groups argue that raising output is not only about meeting OPEC quotas but about feeding local plants.
A caution is needed. The $6 billion is an association estimate, not an official government budget, and it covers equipment, not the field development, drilling services and infrastructure that also cost money. Targets also depend on licences turning into producing fields and on security and pricing conditions that equipment cannot fix. The signals to watch are whether the financing scheme closes its first deals, whether rig counts keep rising, and whether skilled workers stay.
