|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Dangote Says Kenya Court Order Won’t Stop Wednesday’s Refinery Groundbreaking, But Site Work May Be Limited
Dangote Group said Monday that a Kenyan court ruling over disputed land in Lamu will not derail Wednesday’s planned groundbreaking ceremony for its proposed 700,000 barrel-per-day refinery, even though the order does restrict what can happen on part of the site in the meantime.
The Malindi Environment and Land Court, presided over by Justice Jane Onyango, issued the order on September 25, though it only became public on Monday. It directs that the status quo on a specific parcel, LR No. 13061 in the Hindi/Manda Magogoni area of Lamu County, be maintained until October 14, when the case is set for a full hearing. Until then, the parties named in the case, including Dangote Industries, Kenya’s Office of the President and the Lamu County government, are barred from clearing, excavating, fencing, demolishing, constructing on or otherwise interfering with the portions of that land occupied by the petitioners. The order carries a penal notice, meaning any violation could bring legal consequences.
In a statement, Dangote Group confirmed the ruling had not stopped the groundbreaking ceremony itself, while acknowledging that site activities may be affected since both sides are required to hold off on any work on the disputed land until the October hearing takes place. That distinction matters because it separates the symbolic launch event, which Kenyan President William Ruto is due to perform on Wednesday, from the practical construction work that would normally follow soon after.
The case was brought by 133 residents of Chandavai, a community in Lamu County, led by Salim Tima Swale. They argue the land in question is ancestral property their families have occupied and farmed for generations, even though that occupation was never formally registered. According to their court filings, government and Lamu Port-South Sudan-Ethiopia Transport Corridor officials, along with heavy machinery and bulldozers, entered the disputed area in August 2024 and destroyed crops, trees and other property without prior notice or compensation. The residents say soil testing and other preparatory work tied to the refinery began in July 2026, and that police officers, local chiefs and other officials cleared part of the disputed land on September 10, just weeks before the planned groundbreaking. They further allege they have received no resettlement plan and fear being displaced within the very county they’ve lived in for years.
Justice Onyango’s order was carefully limited in scope. Rather than issuing a blanket injunction against the entire refinery project, which the petitioners had actually sought, the court narrowed its ruling to the specific disputed parcels, a distinction legal observers say was deliberate and allows the high-profile ceremony to go ahead while the underlying land rights dispute continues to work through the courts. The respondents named in the case, which also include Kenya’s National Land Commission and State Law Office, have been given 14 days to file their formal responses to the petition.
The Lamu refinery is one of the largest single foreign investments in Kenya’s recent history, with Dangote outlining plans for a facility costing somewhere between $16 billion and $17 billion, separate from the massive Lagos refinery that has already reshaped Nigeria’s own fuel market and is currently at the center of Dangote’s record-setting stock offering back home. The Kenyan facility is designed to process crude sourced from the country’s Lokichar oilfields along with regional suppliers, and Dangote has said the project could also generate up to 1,000 megawatts of power alongside its refining capacity, positioning Lamu as a future regional energy hub rather than just a processing plant. Logistics for the launch were already well underway before the court order surfaced, with roughly 2,930 tonnes of construction equipment reported to have arrived at Lamu Port by September 26 in preparation for Wednesday’s ceremony.
The dispute also touches on a broader and more sensitive claim from the petitioners, who allege the land was transferred to Kenya’s Ministry of Defence for military infrastructure expansion without their knowledge or consent, a claim that, if accurate, would tie the refinery dispute into a separate and potentially thornier question about how the underlying land was allocated in the first place, well before Dangote’s own involvement in the project.
For now, the practical outcome is a narrow but real complication rather than a full stop. Wednesday’s groundbreaking is set to proceed as planned, giving Ruto and Dangote the high-profile launch moment they’ve been building toward, while lawyers for both the residents and the project’s backers prepare for the October 14 hearing that will determine what happens next on the specific stretch of land at the center of the case. Whether that hearing produces a negotiated resettlement, a ruling in favor of the residents, or confirmation that the disputed parcel can proceed as originally planned will likely shape how smoothly the rest of the refinery’s construction timeline unfolds from here.
